MG Legal, Nationwide Food Allergy Solicitors. The team that puts you first. Contact us for a free, no-obligation consultation: 01772 783314 or email at: injury@mglegal.co.uk
Restaurant owner fined for selling a curry that could be harmful to someone with an allergy.
Raj Uddin Qureshi, owner of Taj Mahal Restaurant in Richmond North Yorkshire, has been fined for selling a curry that could have caused a life-threatening reaction if eaten by someone with a nut allergy.
The curry was described as peanut-free when, in fact, it was made using a mixed-nut ingredient that contained peanuts.
Raj Uddin Qureshi appeared before York Magistrates’ Court on Friday December 9th following a test purchase at his restaurant by a Trading Standards officer from North Yorkshire County Council.
The officer made the unannounced visit to the Taj Mahal Restaurant, Trinity Church Square, Richmond, on 6 January this year to order a peanut-free “no nut, no peanut” chicken tikka masala curry following a complaint from a member of the public.
The food was analysed and peanut protein was detected. The analysis found the dish would have caused a person with a peanut allergy to experience an allergic reaction.
Trading Standards discovered the restaurant was using a mixed-nut ingredient that contained peanut. A subsequent investigation found Qureshi failed to provide training to his staff regarding allergens and had no system of recording allergen information for the foods sold by the business.
Qureshi pleaded guilty to offences of selling food not of the substance demanded by the purchaser, and of placing on the market food which was unsafe and injurious to the health of a person with an allergy to peanuts.
He also pleaded guilty to the unfair practice of using a menu that falsely claimed the restaurant was rated ‘5 very good’ for food hygiene when no such hygiene rating had been awarded. Following the visit from Trading Standards, the restaurant received a food hygiene inspection from Richmondshire District Council’s environmental health officers and was issued with a food hygiene rating of ‘1 Major Improvement Required’.
Qureshi was fined £500 for each of two food safety offences relating to the sale of the curry, £500 for each of two offences relating to the false food hygiene rating, and was ordered to pay a £50 victim surcharge and prosecution costs of £500. Adding up to a total of £2,550.
.
If you have suffered an allergic reaction after eating food from a restaurant Contact us here, as you may be eligible to make a nut allergic reaction claim with our nut allergy claims solicitors.
Our food allergy solicitors accept all of our food allergy claims and nut allergic reaction claims, on a NO WIN NO FEE basis, and have a success rate of over 99%.
For further information, please visit our Food Allergy Claims or Food Allergy Compensation Claims Guide pages.
Suffered a food allergy reaction, in the last 3 years? Call 01772 783314 Or, fill in your details and our personal injury solicitors will contact you within one working hour.
Statement from Cllr Derek Bastiman
Executive member for Trading Standards, Cllr Derek Bastiman, has said, "The potential harm that could have come about had this food been ordered and consumed by a person with an allergy to peanuts is very real."
"There have been deaths as a result of undeclared food allergens."
"It is vital that food businesses take responsibility for complying with their legal responsibilities to ensure consumers are protected and can rely on the descriptions and claims given to them."
"I call on all businesses to review their practices regarding food allergens. It is not acceptable to put lives at risk.”